Saturday, March 29, 2014

Here's my take on an issue being debated by the Supreme Court...
Does the Affordable Care Act’s provision requiring health insurance policies to covers medication and procedures that some employers believes are contrary to their religious convictions, constitute an infringement of the employer’s religious freedom?
Provision of health insurance to employees is a fringe benefit and a form of indirect compensation. One solution regarding a conflicted employer’s dilemma regarding the exercise of their religious freedom is for such employers not to provide not to provide coverage to employees, but instead give them a dollar amount equivalent to what they would have contributed to their health insurance insurance. The employees can, then, if they choose, purchase their own health insurance, just as they are free to purchase any other commodity with the money they are paid for their labor.

When an employer provides health insurance for their employees, that benefit is not taxed. In order to make up for the additional income tax the employees would have to pay when they buy their own health insurance, the federal government can and should make the cost of non-employer provided health insurance tax deductible. The net effect on tax revenue would be the same either way.